Recent Posts

Categories

Archives

Contributors

Contact Lux Libertas



LuxLibertas RSS Feed


  By • Oct 31st, 2009 • Category: Civil Liberty, Economics, Ethics, Health Care, Opinion, Politics

This is the fourth installment of a nine-part series excerpting the chapter on medical care from the new edition of economist Thomas Sowell’s “Applied Economics.”

 


IBD Exclusive Series:
Thomas Sowell on The Economics of Medical Care


 

A major source of the high cost of American medical care is malpractice insurance for doctors and hospitals.

The average cost of this insurance for individual doctors ranges from about $14,000 a year in California to nearly $40,000 a year in West Virginia. In particular specialties, such as obstetrics and neurosurgery, the cost of malpractice insurance can exceed $200,000 a year in some places.

These costs of course get passed on to patients, the government or whoever is paying for medical treatments. Even so, these are not the only financial costs created by medical malpractice lawsuits, nor are financial costs the only costs or necessarily the most important costs.

The threat of lawsuits can impose costs on obstetricians that raise their insurance premiums high enough to cause many of these doctors to stop delivering babies, or to stop delivering them in places where high jury awards on dubious evidence make it uneconomic to continue practicing obstetrics.

The net result of this can be that pregnant women in those places are at more risk than before because now there may be no doctor available in the vicinity to deliver their baby when the time comes.

Nor are obstetricians the only doctors who flee from places where it is easy to file lawsuits and win large damage awards. Pennsylvania, for example, lost one third of its surgeons between 1995 and 2002.

Ideally, juries would award malpractice damages only when the probability that malpractice had actually taken place was sufficiently clear, and the award only at a level sufficient to compensate real damages and deter such malpractice in the future.

In reality, an injured, deformed, or brain-damaged baby and an eloquent lawyer can lead to jury awards in the millions of dollars, even when it is by no means clear that the doctor who delivered that baby was in any way at fault.

A large study conducted jointly by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the American Academy of Pediatrics — released in 2003 and reviewed and approved by leading medical authorities in and out of government, as well as from as far away as Australia and New Zealand — concluded that “the vast majority of brain damage and cerebral palsy among these infants originates in factors largely or completely outside the control of delivery room personnel.”

Read more at: http://www.investors.com/NewsAndAnalysis/Article.aspx?id=510866


Share

1 Comment »

  1. High malpractice costs are, indeed, a problem. To solve the problem we need true malpractice reform to get to the root cause of the problem — malpractice itself.

    National Practitioner Data Bank data shows that in most states only about two percent of physicians have been responsible for over half of all the money paid out for malpractice since 1990. NPDB data also shows that quite often these two percent have multiple payments in their records but no action by state licensing boards to revoke their licenses or restrict their practices. Similarly, most often no action has been taken by hospital peer reviewers to revoke or restrict their clinical privileges. So the “repeat offenders” continue commit more malpractice.

    To have true malpractice reform the licensing boards and peer reviewers need to get serious about protecting the public from physicians with a pattern of malpractice.

    It is also worth noting that there are fewer than 20,000 malpractice payments each year for all causes although the Institute of Medicine estimates that there are about 100,000 deaths each year from malpractice. Other sources double that number. Only about 28 percent of malpractice payments involve patient death. Thus we can estimate that at most only about 3 to 6 percent of all malpractice victims receive any malpractice payment.

    The real problem isn’t malpractice payments. To save money — and more importantly, to save lives and prevent injury — we need true malpractice reform that reduces malpractice itself. We need to stop treating the symptoms — malpractice payments — and instead treat the disease — malpractice.

    Comment by Robert Oshel — November 1, 2009 @ 5:49 am

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment