Pages
- About Lux Libertas
- Chronology of the Current Fiscal Crisis
- Maps
- United States Government
- The Articles of Confederation
- The Federalist Papers
- The Declaration of Independence
- Constitution of the United States
- United States History
The Founding Fathers Said...
- May 21, 1881: Clara Barton founded what became the American Red Cross.
- May 21, 1927: Charles Lindbergh became the first person to fly across the Atlantic (from New York to Paris) in his monoplane, The Spirit of St. Louis.
- May 21, 1932: Amelia Earhart became the first woman to fly solo across the Atlantic Ocean (from Newfoundland to Ireland).
- More events from This Day in History: May 21
Tags
Meta
Recent Posts
- WSJ – Bain Capitalism 101
- Counterfeit Kenyan
- A Rough Sunday for Team Obama
- Illegal Aliens Get Billions in Tax Refunds
- Two Is Enough
- The Real Issue is Pakistan
- Obama Pursues Higher Tax Rates, Growth Be Damned
- Random Thoughts About Romney and Race
- A Bush-Cheney Green Energy Project That May Increase America’s Proven Natural Gas Reserves by a Factor of 100
- After 16 Months of Letters, Reports and Subpoenas, Will We Ever Get Truth on Fast and Furious?
Categories
- America
- Book Review
- Censorship
- Civil Liberty
- Cyber War
- Economics
- Editorial
- Education
- Energy
- Environment
- Ethics
- Global Warming
- Government Waste
- Gun Control
- Health Care
- History
- Homeland Security
- Humor
- Illegal Immigration
- Inspiration
- Intelligence
- International Relations
- Judiciary
- Labor
- Media Bias
- National Defense
- Opinion
- Our Foundation
- Patriotism
- Politics
- Presidency
- Religion/Faith
- Secrecy
- Taxation
- The Constitution
- The Patriot's Journal
- the UN
- Trade
- Uncategorized
- Valor
- Veteran's Affairs
- Video
- War of Independence
- War on Drugs
- War on Terror
- We Remember
- World War I
- World War II
Archives
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
Contributors
Contact Lux Libertas

By Thomas Sowell (Archive) ยท Tuesday, January 31, 2012
California has a huge state debt and Washington has a huge national debt. But that does not discourage either Governor Jerry Brown or President Barack Obama from wanting to launch a very costly high-speed rail system.
Most of us might be a little skittish about spending money if we were teetering on the brink of bankruptcy. But the beauty of politics is that it is all other people’s money, including among those other people generations yet unborn.
The high-speed rail system proposed for California has been envisioned as a model for similar systems elsewhere in the United States. A recent story in the San Francisco Chronicle used the high-speed rail system in Spain as an analogy for California.
Spain is about the same size as California, and has a similar population density — and population density is the key to the economic viability of mass transportation, from subways to high-speed rail.
It so happens that I have ridden on Spain’s high-speed rail system. It was very nice, especially since I did not have to pay the full costs, which were subsidized by the Spanish taxpayers.
While the Spanish government has been subsidizing the passengers on its high-speed rail system, the European Union has been subsidizing the Spanish government. Someone once said that government is the illusion that we can all live off somebody else. Spain’s high-speed rail system is not even covering its operating costs, never mind the enormous costs of setting up the system in the first place. One reason is that half the seats are empty in the high-speed trains in Spain.
That is what happens when you don’t have the population density required for passengers to cover the operating costs. You would need the hordes of Genghis Khan riding the high-speed rail system to cover the additional costs of the rails and the trains.
An economics professor at the University of Barcelona says that Spain “has not recovered one single euro from the infrastructure investment.”
The most famous high-speed rail system is that in Japan, one of the most densely populated countries in the world. The “bullet train” between Tokyo and Osaka has 130 million riders a year. Tokyo alone has more than three times the population of San Francisco and Los Angeles put together.
In California, an element of farce has been added to the impending economic tragedy, if the envisioned high-speed rail system actually materializes.
The first leg of the system is planned to run between Fresno and Bakersfield. If those names don’t ring a bell with you, there is a reason. They are modest-sized communities out in the agricultural San Joaquin Valley, well removed from San Francisco or Los Angeles.
You can bet the rent money that high-speed rail traffic between Fresno and Bakersfield will never come within shouting distance of covering the operating costs. Some people have analogized putting such a rail line between these two towns to the infamous “bridge to nowhere” in Alaska.
Why are they doing it? Because they can.
If they began this project where they want it to go — between San Francisco and Los Angeles — they would run into so much opposition from the environmentalists, and from local politicians influenced by the environmentalists, that the delays could take the high-speed rail advocates beyond the time limit for using the federal subsidy money. But the green fanatics have not yet taken over politically out in the San Joaquin Valley.
The only reason for even thinking about building a high-speed rail line between Fresno and Bakersfield is just to get the project underway with federal money, making it politically more difficult to stop the larger project for a similar rail line between San Francisco and Los Angeles.
In other words, they are going to start wasting money out in the valley, so that they will be able to waste more money later on, along the coast. This may not make any sense economically, but it can make sense politically for Jerry Brown and Barack Obama.
Read more at: http://patriotpost.us/opinion/thomas-sowell/2012/01/31/getting-nowhere-very-fast/
No Comments »
No comments yet.
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

