Nov 7, 2009

By Rick Moran

After reading this piece by Betsy McCaughey in the Wall Street Journal, listing the low lights of Pelosi’s 2,000 page (so far) monstrosity, you will probably feel as sick to your stomach as I am right now.

The American people really don’t have a clue what they’re in for. McCaughey may be a controversial critic of national health care, but the requirements and mandates she lists - as well as the destruction of Medicare - seem pretty cut and dried.

For individuals:

• Sec. 202 (p. 91-92) of the bill requires you to enroll in a “qualified plan.” If you get your insurance at work, your employer will have a “grace period” to switch you to a “qualified plan,” meaning a plan designed by the Secretary of Health and Human Services. If you buy your own insurance, there’s no grace period. You’ll have to enroll in a qualified plan as soon as any term in your contract changes, such as the co-pay, deductible or benefit.• Sec. 224 (p. 118) provides that 18 months after the bill becomes law, the Secretary of Health and Human Services will decide what a “qualified plan” covers and how much you’ll be legally required to pay for it. That’s like a banker telling you to sign the loan agreement now, then filling in the interest rate and repayment terms 18 months later.

Check out the changes in Medicare:

• Sec. 1114 (pp. 391-393) replaces physicians with physician assistants in overseeing care for hospice patients.

• Secs. 1158-1160 (pp. 499-520) initiates programs to reduce payments for patient care to what it costs in the lowest cost regions of the country. This will reduce payments for care (and by implication the standard of care) for hospital patients in higher cost areas such as New York and Florida.

• Sec. 1161 (pp. 520-545) cuts payments to Medicare Advantage plans (used by 20% of seniors). Advantage plans have warned this will result in reductions in optional benefits such as vision and dental care.

How about this for a skewed priority:

Secs. 2521 and 2533 (pp. 1379 and 1437) establishes racial and ethnic preferences in awarding grants for training nurses and creating secondary-school health science programs. For example, grants for nursing schools should “give preference to programs that provide for improving the diversity of new nurse graduates to reflect changes in the demographics of the patient population.” And secondary-school grants should go to schools “graduating students from disadvantaged backgrounds including racial and ethnic minorities.”

There’s much more at the link - if you want to get more depressed.

Read at: http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2009/11/what_is_in_the_pelosi_health_c.html

No Comments »

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment