Recent Posts

Categories

Archives

Contributors

Contact Lux Libertas



LuxLibertas RSS Feed


  By • Nov 30th, 2010 • Category: Civil Liberty, Ethics, International Relations, National Defense, Opinion, Politics

Foreign leaders will continue to talk to us. It is the way of power to brag, and to tempt visitors from afar.

Nov 30, 2010
WSJ

By FOUAD AJAMI

The founder of WikiLeaks, Julian Assange, is no Daniel Ellsberg. Say what you will about the man who put out the secret history of the Vietnam War, he had skin in the game. He had been a hawk and had grown disillusioned with the war before leaking in 1971 the classified documents that came to be known as the Pentagon Papers.

Not so this Australian practitioner of electronic piracy. Mr. Assange feeds off the taste for high gossip. Doubtless, he sees himself as truth-teller at war with an American “empire” with a lot to hide. But he communicates brazenness and a love of the limelight that is of a piece with this time when all discretion and privacy are now things of the past.

There can be no denying the appeal of this big dump of diplomatic cables. We want to see the political deities in Ankara and Rome and Riyadh as they are, unmasked. We now know what we knew before, but on official paper. So Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi is “feckless, vain and ineffective,” a man whose “frequent late nights and penchant for partying hard mean he does not get sufficient rest.” We now know that Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi is “mercurial and eccentric,” that he loves horse racing and flamenco dancing, that he fears flying over water. In short, he is the “flake” that Ronald Reagan dubbed him a quarter century ago.

There is gambling going on at Rick’s! Foreign leaders play the American empire and wish it to do what they can’t do for themselves. In the public domain, Arab leaders are solicitous of Iran and fear its reach and power. But when American diplomats and military commanders turn up, the Arab-Persian schism is laid out. From Lebanon’s young Prime Minister Saad Hariri, then parliament majority leader in 2006: “Iraq was unnecessary,” he claimed, “Iran is necessary.”

There had always been a received wisdom about the secrecy of the House of Saud, the cunning of Saudi diplomacy. The cables lend credence to the prevailing view. King Abdullah plays to type—he is blunt and self-assured. In 2008, on the challenge of Iran, a close aide says the king wants the Americans “to cut off the head of the snake.”

Read more at: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704584804575644760960672700.html?mod=WSJ_Opinion_LEADTop


Share

No Comments »

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment